Quote:
Originally Posted by dCiSo For those of you who were offering Ideas and had genuine questions thank you and for those of you who were not I don't really have anything to say. I ask that this thread is kept to honest suggestion and question not a flame war. |
Have you considered a
Source Forge project?
The most common objection to oss is that it's hard to make money. RedHat and Suse make money on Linux by selling support. One previous post (don't know if it's still here) stated that you weren't interested in money, but wanted this project to be
just a hobby, won't be big and
professional. For those of you too lazy to click through, this is a post from
Linus Torvalds from when he was working on another project which kinda became a big deal.
Other objections to oss also relate to the corporate world. Security, stability, and accountability are all factors working against oss at times. However, this arguement works both ways. More people reviewing the code (as well as a host of other reasons detailed here:
Why Open Source Is The Optimum Economic Paradigm for Software by
Dan Kaminsky) means problems get fixed faster. Or in
other words: The Law of Software Engineering:
"Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow."
As for stability and accountability, everyone knows that loading custom code is not only risky but downright dangerous which is why it voids your
Warranty. More to the point, dCiSo by restricting development you slow the development cycle and retain accountability to a single developer rather than sharing the load among the community.